A person holding binoculars and looking through them with the word 'Insights' written overlaying the image.

‍ ‍The 2026 Apparel Sourcing & Tariff Guide

Trade policy is moving fast enough that last quarter's sourcing math is already out of date. This is the reference MTAR uses internally, updated as the rules change, organized so you can find what applies to your supply chain in under a minute.

Last updated as of: August 2026. Tariff policy is contested and shifting, treat the figures below as directional and confirm specifics with your customs broker before making a sourcing decision.

Where U.S. Apparel Tariffs Stand Right Now

Section 122 tariffs expired July 23, 2026. Section 301 forced labor tariffs took effect July 24 across 60 economies, stacking on top of standard MFN duty rather than replacing it. On a cotton knit tee (HTS 6109.10.00, 16.5% MFN), that stacking produces roughly: Guatemala 0% (CAFTA-DR exemption, see Section 2) · 10% tier countries ≈26.5% (India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Malaysia, Pakistan, Jordan, Honduras, El Salvador, Canada, Mexico, UK) · 12.5% tier countries ≈29% (Vietnam, Thailand, Philippines, Türkiye, Morocco, Peru, DR, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Brazil, Israel) · China, which carries an additional pre-existing Section 301 tariff of 7.5–25% depending on HTS list, on top of the above.

Related reading: Understanding the Section 301 Investigation · Global Tariffs Rise from 10 Percent to 15 Percent: What This Means for Apparel and Retail Supply Chains · Tariffs, Customs Bonds, and the Hidden Cost of Trade Disruption · How the Supreme Court Upended Trump's Tariff Strategy and What Comes Next for U.S. Trade Policy

The CAFTA-DR, USMCA & Reciprocal Trade Exemptions

CAFTA-DR, USMCA, and the Jordan FTA textile exemptions were preserved through the 2026 changes meaning qualifying apparel from Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, Canada, and Jordan can still enter the U.S. duty free under the yarn forward rule (yarn spinning and every operation forward must occur in the U.S. or the qualifying region). November 2025 frameworks additionally removed the 10% reciprocal tariff that had applied to qualifying CAFTA compliant apparel from Guatemala and El Salvador, meaningfully widening the landed cost gap against Asia origin sourcing.

Related reading: U.S.–Guatemala Reciprocal Trade Agreement: A Defining Moment for Nearshored Apparel Supply Chains · The U.S.: El Salvador Textile Signal Is Bigger Than El Salvador · US Taiwan Reciprocal Trade Agreement Signals Strategic Shift in Global Sourcing · US Bangladesh Reciprocal Trade Deal Reshapes Apparel Sourcing Economics

De Minimis and Import Policy

The de minimis exemption which had let low value shipments enter duty-free is under active legal challenge, with real consequences for direct to consumer and small batch import models that leaned on it. Brands still structuring fulfillment around de minimis should treat that strategy as high risk through 2026.

Related reading: De Minimis Under Fire: What the New Court Battle Means for Apparel Supply Chains

Why Brands Are Moving Now, Not Waiting

$300 billion in U.S. imports changed country of origin as brands responded to 2025–2026 tariff volatility, not as a one time reaction, but as a structural reset of where apparel gets made. Brands that move early capture two things at once: a lower landed cost immediately, and a supply chain that's no longer exposed to the next round of trade policy.

Related reading: The Great Supply Chain Reset: Why $300 Billion in U.S. Imports Changed Country of Origin · US Fashion Firms Accelerate Sourcing Shift as Supply Chains Falter · What the Great American Cotton Plan Means for Apparel Brands and Sourcing Teams

Beyond Tariffs: The Logistics Risk Stacking on Top

Duty rate is one variable in landed cost, freight and transit risk is the other, and 2026 has been volatile on both fronts: Strait of Malacca disruption, oil driven freight cost swings, air cargo capacity crunches, and geopolitical chokepoints from the Strait of Hormuz to the Iran conflict have all moved apparel and footwear cost structures independent of tariff policy. Nearshore production doesn't just reduce duty exposure it shortens the transit leg where most of this risk lives.

Related reading: The Strait of Malacca Just Became a Pricing Lever · Oil Volatility Is Rewriting the Cost Structure of Apparel, Footwear, and Textiles · Air Cargo Disruption Is Back · Strait of Hormuz Closure Threat: Who Gets Hit the Hardest · Iran Conflict Sends Shockwaves Through Asia's Trade and Manufacturing Hubs

Country Spotlights

Deeper reads on specific origin countries and what's shifting there: A Critical Moment for the World's Second Largest Apparel Exporter (Bangladesh) · EU Crackdown on Unsold Apparel Destruction: A Structural Shift for Global Brands.

See What This Means for Your Landed Cost

These figures are directional, your actual exposure depends on HTS classification, country of origin, and how your program is currently structured. Send us your current sourcing mix and we'll walk through where the real savings are.

Run Your Numbers →